PDA

View Full Version : Former Beatle Paul McCartney, Wife Separate


Sue
05-17-2006, 01:26 PM
LONDON (May 17) - Former Beatle Paul McCartney and his second wife, Heather Mills McCartney, said Wednesday that they are separating after nearly four years of marriage, blaming intrusion from the media and insisting their split is amicable.

Rumors of a rift between Mills McCartney and the singer's children - especially Stella McCartney - have circulated for years. Talk centered around the idea that Mills McCartney - who is nearly half his age - wanted to devote more time to campaigning against land mines and fur.

"Having tried exceptionally hard to make our relationship work given the daily pressures surrounding us, it is with sadness that we have decided to go our separate ways," a statement from the couple said. "Our parting is amicable and both of us still care about each other very much."

McCartney, 63, and Mills, 38, married in June 2002, four years after his former wife, Linda McCartney, died of breast cancer. McCartney and Mills had a daughter, Beatrice, in October 2003.

"Separation for any couple is difficult enough, but to have to go through this so publicly, especially with a small daughter, is immensely stressful," it added. "We hope, for the sake of our baby daughter, that we will be given some space and time to get through this difficult period."

McCartney's wealth was estimated at $1.5 billion by the Sunday Times in their annual list of Britain's richest people. The couple are believed not to have a prenuptial agreement.

Speculation immediately arose about the size of a possible settlement, with lawyers estimating Mills McCartney's share of the former Beatle's fortune at between $188 million and $376 million.

On Wednesday afternoon, McCartney posted a message on his personal Web site, saying he was very upset over suggestions that Mills McCartney had married him for his money.

"It's been suggested that she married me for the money and there is not an ounce of truth in this," he said in the post. "She is a very generous person who spends most of her time trying to help others in greater need than herself. All the work she does is unpaid, so these stories are ridiculous and completely unfounded. I'm very sad to see that some insensitive people would choose a moment like this to spread these vicious rumors."

What's your take on celebrity marriages? Are they intriguing or a disaster waiting to happen?

In 2002, Heather Mills told Vanity Fair that McCartney didn't force her to sign a prenuptial agreement before their huge wedding - despite tabloid reports to the contrary.

Mills said she offered to sign an agreement, but that McCartney - who was worth more than $1 billion at the time - wouldn't allow it.

"I wanted to prove that I love him for him," she was quoted by the magazine as saying. "He said, 'I wouldn't let you."'

McCartney told the magazine that he knew some people would think he was being ****ered by a gold digger.


Mills McCartney has been accused of meddling in her husband's career - such as the dismissal of his longtime publicist Geoff Baker - and even of influencing him on issues as diverse as dying his hair and plastic surgery.


In a statement on her personal Web site, Mills McCartney posted a note from McCartney blasting the press and denying the rumors.

"Although some of these articles can be funny, there are others that are plain malicious and you need to be strong not to be hurt by some of the cruel suggestions that flow from these peoples pens," the statement said.

"The media sometimes suggests a rift between my kids and Heather, but in fact we get on great and anyone who knows our family can see this for themselves," McCartney wrote.

Mills is a former model and a vociferous animal rights campaigner who recently traveled with McCartney to eastern Canada to fight that country's seal hunt. The couple met in 1999 through Mills' charity, the Heather Mills Health Trust. She launched the trust after losing a leg in a motorcycle accident in 1993.

News of the split was first reported in Wednesday's edition of the Daily Mirror.

McCartney already has three children from his marriage to Linda, who died in 1998 - musician James, photographer Mary, and fashion designer Stella. He also has a stepdaughter, Heather, from Linda McCartney's first marriage.

love2sing
05-17-2006, 03:29 PM
Hmmmm..... so this must mean he's eligible again? hmmmm.......

mark
05-17-2006, 03:31 PM
Sounds that way. But worth $380 mil less.


Hmmmm..... so this must mean he's eligible again? hmmmm.......

love2sing
05-17-2006, 03:34 PM
Oh Mark, I love him for his music! How shallow do you think I am?

SHOELUVRSIS
05-17-2006, 08:02 PM
i commend Paul on not having a pre-nup before he wed (although many
would argue otherwise)
what? comeon the guys too old to spend the money he has and its not about love if there is a pre-nup involved - on both sides. doesnt love involve trust?
no matter what he did to her money will never make it better or take that
away - its blood money - who would want that anyway?
hope she does right by him and him by her.
sorry to hear such news

love2sing
05-17-2006, 08:19 PM
It is a shame considering what a wonderful marriage he had with his first wife, Linda. Naturally, it is even more difficult since they have a child together. I don't believe she married him for his money. As for him, having had such a successful first marriage and given the business he is in, I think he would know if someone loved him or not.

As for pre-nupt's, I would have no problem signing one. I have no money to speak of and if I were marrying someone with a lot of money, I would encourage them to protect it. It's not unfair to come away with exactly what you came in with.

SHOELUVRSIS
05-17-2006, 09:31 PM
if someone asked me to sign a pre-nup i wouldnt marry them -
not b/c they didnt trust me but because i would feel that they didnt know who the hell i was or what was important to me.
protecting your assets? you better cover those nutzzzzzzzz :D

sarcastic1
05-17-2006, 10:18 PM
you know, no matter how well you think you know someone it all changes when the lawyers get involved. Seen it happen so many times.

shoeluvr
05-18-2006, 06:05 AM
i was sad to hear they are splitting

love2sing
05-18-2006, 06:46 AM
you know, no matter how well you think you know someone it all changes when the lawyers get involved. Seen it happen so many times.

Generally, this is the case with lawyers. However, when my husband was divorcing his first wife, they argued over every single thing. Finally, his lawyer told him to "pick his fights", or this could wind up costing him a fortune. Unfortnately, our marriage disintegrated as well. We really didn't acquire much together and whatever we had, I told him to keep. He declined that offer. Sadly, he is still arguing with the first wife and that whole situation was a major catalyst in the break up of our marriage.

chinarain62
05-18-2006, 08:02 AM
i commend Paul on not having a pre-nup before he wed (although many
would argue otherwise)
what? comeon the guys too old to spend the money he has and its not about love if there is a pre-nup involved - on both sides. doesnt love involve trust?
no matter what he did to her money will never make it better or take that
away - its blood money - who would want that anyway?
hope she does right by him and him by her.
sorry to hear such news


I'm with you Kelli. This gal doesn't seem the type that would take him to the cleaners. And if lawyers try to encourage her to be otherwise than I hope she has the moxy to say F*** u to them.

I hope it's a quiet, peaceful divorce not only for their child but for each other. Life's too short to be at odds all the time.

SHOELUVRSIS
05-18-2006, 09:45 AM
I hope it's a quiet, peaceful divorce not only for their child but for each other. Life's too short to be at odds all the time.

so true!

lawyers? only if there is a problem w/ child custody/visitation rights,
everything else is material - get over it and move on!
(also sad but true)

SHOELUVRSIS
05-18-2006, 09:49 AM
you know, no matter how well you think you know someone it all changes when the lawyers get involved. Seen it happen so many times.

i'm sure sarc but like i said above why would you need a lawyer
for material things? your getting divorced!
thats horrible enough! your going to fight over who gets what?
ok maybe you need to grow up! (not YOU per se ;) - but you
know what i mean)
kinda like what Gina said-lifes too short

GreggFromJoisey
05-18-2006, 10:53 AM
I have a very fair divorce.
All I can say, no offense to Paul, but join the club my friend! (to the tune of Birthday) do do do do doooo do dah do You say its divorce day! do do do do doooo do dah do :D

macca
05-18-2006, 10:28 PM
Even though he did NOT have a pre-nup, don't let that disillusion you. Paul is a VERY shrewd business man and has ALL the bases covered.

love2sing
05-19-2006, 06:45 AM
As my signature says:


"All you really need is love, but a little pre-nuptial agreement now and then doesn't hurt."
Linda Furino

GreggFromJoisey
05-19-2006, 07:58 AM
In fact Heather won't have a leg to stand on! OOOOH low blow. Sorry!
Even though he did NOT have a pre-nup, don't let that disillusion you. Paul is a VERY shrewd business man and has ALL the bases covered.